Never ever or no matter what: Investigating Adoption Intentions and Misconceptions about the Corona-Warn-App in Germany

Authors:
Maximilian Häring, Eva Gerlitz, Christian Tiefenau, Matthew Smith, Dominik Wermke, Sascha Fahl, and Yasemin Acar.
Venue:
17th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS)
Date:
August 8-10, 2021
Type:
Conference publication

Abstract

To help tackle the COVID-19 pandemic, the tech community has put forward proximity detection apps to help warn people who might have been exposed to the coronavirus. The privacy implications of such apps have been discussed both in academic circles and the general population. The discussion in Germany focused on the trade-off between a centralized or decentralized approach for data collection and processing and their implications. Specifically, privacy dominated the public debate about the proposed “Corona-Warn-App".

This paper presents a study with a quota sample of the German population (n = 744) to assess what the population knew about the soon-to-be-released app and their willingness to use it. We also presented participants potential properties the app could have and asked them how these would affect their usage intention.

Based on our findings, we discuss our participants’ views on privacy and functionality, including their perception of selected centralized and decentralized features. We also examine a wide range of false beliefs and information that was not communicated successfully. Especially technical details, such as that the app would use Bluetooth, as opposed to location services, were unknown to many participants.

Our results give insights on the complicated relationship of trust in the government and public communication on the population’s willingness to adopt the app.